An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals
Maskara, R., Bhootra, V., Thakkar, D. & Nishkalank, N. A study on the perception of medical professionals towards artificial intelligence. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev. 4, 34–39 (2017).
Oh, S. et al. Physician confidence in artificial intelligence: an online mobile survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, e12422 (2019).
Google Scholar
Choudhury, A., Asan, O. & Medow, J. E. Clinicians’ perceptions of an artificial intelligence–based blood utilization calculator: qualitative exploratory study. JMIR Hum. Factors 9, 1–9 (2022).
Google Scholar
Pallay, C. Vom Turing-Test zum General Problem Solver. Die Pionierjahre der künstlichen Intelligenz. in Philosophisches Handbuch Künstliche Intelligenz (ed. Mainzer, K.) 1–20 (Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23715-8_3-1.
Liyanage, H. et al. Artificial intelligence in primary health care: perceptions, issues, and challenges. Yearb. Med. Inform. 28, 41–46 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dimiduk, D. M., Holm, E. A. & Niezgoda, S. R. Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 7, 157–172 (2018).
Google Scholar
Aapro, M. et al. Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives. Support. Care Cancer 28, 4589–4612 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lugtenberg, M., Weenink, J. W., Van Der Weijden, T., Westert, G. P. & Kool, R. B. Implementation of multiple-domain covering computerized decision support systems in primary care: a focus group study on perceived barriers. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 15, 1–11 (2015).
Google Scholar
Radionova, N. et al. The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care. BMC Palliat. Care 19, 1–9 (2020).
Google Scholar
Strohm, L., Hehakaya, C., Ranschaert, E. R., Boon, W. P. C. & Moors, E. H. M. Implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in radiology: hindering and facilitating factors. Eur. Radiol. 30, 5525–5532 (2020).
Google Scholar
Waymel, Q., Badr, S., Demondion, X., Cotten, A. & Jacques, T. Impact of the rise of artificial intelligence in radiology: what do radiologists think? Diagn. Interv. Imaging 100, 327–336 (2019).
Google Scholar
Choudhury, A., Saremi, M. L. & Urena, E. Perception, trust, and accountability affecting acceptance of artificial intelligence: from research to clinician viewpoint. In Diverse Perspectives and State-of-the-Art Approaches to the Utilization of Data-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems 105–124 (IGI Global, 2023).
Abdullah, R. & Fakieh, B. Health care employees’ perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence applications: survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, 1–8 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jiang, L. et al. Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in the medical field: current application, emerging problems, and problem-solving strategies. J. Int. Med. Res. 49, 1–11 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fan, W., Liu, J., Zhu, S. & Pardalos, P. M. Investigating the impacting factors for the healthcare professionals to adopt artificial intelligence-based medical diagnosis support system (AIMDSS). Ann. Oper. Res. 294, 567–592 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chismar, W. G. & Wiley-Patton, S. Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians. In Proc. 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2003 (ed. Sprague, R. H. Jr) (IEEE Computer Society, 2003).
Schmidt, P., Biessmann, F. & Teubner, T. Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems. J. Decis. Syst. 29, 260–278 (2020).
Google Scholar
Aljarboa, S., Shah, M. & Kerr, D. Perceptions of the adoption of clinical decision support systems in the Saudi healthcare sector. In Proc. 24th Asia-Pacific Decision Science Institute International Conference (eds Blake, J., Miah, S. J., Houghton, L. & Kerr, D.) 40–53 (Asia Pacific Decision Sciences Institute, 2019).
Prakash, A. V. & Das, S. Medical practitioner’s adoption of intelligent clinical diagnostic decision support systems: a mixed-methods study. Inf. Manag. 58, 103524 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nydert, P., Vég, A., Bastholm-Rahmner, P. & Lindemalm, S. Pediatricians’ understanding and experiences of an electronic clinical-decision-support-system. Online J. Public Health Inform. 9, e200 (2017).
Google Scholar
Petitgand, C., Motulsky, A., Denis, J. L. & Régis, C. Investigating the barriers to physician adoption of an artificial intelligence-based decision support system in emergency care: an interpretative qualitative study. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 270, 1001–1005 (2018).
Horsfall, H. L. et al. Attitudes of the surgical team toward artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: international 2-stage cross-sectional survey. World Neurosurg. 146, e724–e730 (2021).
Google Scholar
Oh, J., Bia, J. R., Ubaid-Ullah, M., Testani, J. M. & Wilson, F. P. Provider acceptance of an automated electronic alert for acute kidney injury. Clin. Kidney J. 9, 567–571 (2016).
Google Scholar
Aljarboa, S. & Miah, S. J. Acceptance of clinical decision support systems in Saudi healthcare organisations. Inf. Dev. (2021).
Liberati, E. G. et al. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation. Implement. Sci. 12, 1–13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Blanco, N. et al. Health care worker perceptions toward computerized clinical decision support tools for Clostridium difficile infection reduction: a qualitative study at 2 hospitals. Am. J. Infect. Control 46, 1160–1166 (2018).
Google Scholar
Grau, L. E., Weiss, J., O’Leary, T. K., Camenga, D. & Bernstein, S. L. Electronic decision support for treatment of hospitalized smokers: a qualitative analysis of physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Drug Alcohol Depend. 194, 296–301 (2019).
Google Scholar
English, D., Ankem, K. & English, K. Acceptance of clinical decision support surveillance technology in the clinical pharmacy. Inform. Health Soc. Care 42, 135–152 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kanagasundaram, N. S. et al. Computerized clinical decision support for the early recognition and management of acute kidney injury: a qualitative evaluation of end-user experience. Clin. Kidney J. 9, 57–62 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yurdaisik, I. & Aksoy, S. H. Evaluation of knowledge and attitudes of radiology department workers about artificial intelligence. Ann. Clin. Anal. Med. 12, 186–190 (2021).
O’Leary, P., Carroll, N. & Richardson, I. The practitioner’s perspective on clinical pathway support systems. In IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics 194–201 (IEEE, 2014).
Jauk, S. et al. Technology acceptance of a machine learning algorithm predicting delirium in a clinical setting: a mixed-methods study. J. Med. Syst. 45, 48 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zheng, B. et al. Attitudes of medical workers in China toward artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a comparative survey. BMC Health Serv. Res. 21, 1067 (2021).
Google Scholar
Khong, P. C. B., Hoi, S. Y., Holroyd, E. & Wang, W. Nurses’ clinical decision making on adopting a wound clinical decision support system. Comput. Inform., Nurs. 33, 295–305 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liang, H.-F., Wu, K.-M., Weng, C.-H. & Hsieh, H.-W. Nurses’ views on the potential use of robots in the pediatric unit. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 47, e58–e64 (2019).
Google Scholar
Panicker, R. O. & Sabu, M. K. Factors influencing the adoption of computerized medical diagnosing system for tuberculosis. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 12, 503–512 (2020).
Catho, G. et al. Factors determining the adherence to antimicrobial guidelines and the adoption of computerised decision support systems by physicians: a qualitative study in three European hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform. 141, 104233 (2020).
Google Scholar
Omar, A., Ellenius, J. & Lindemalm, S. Evaluation of electronic prescribing decision support system at a tertiary care pediatric hospital: the user acceptance perspective. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 234, 256–261 (2017).
Google Scholar
McBride, K. E., Steffens, D., Duncan, K., Bannon, P. G. & Solomon, M. J. Knowledge and attitudes of theatre staff prior to the implementation of robotic-assisted surgery in the public sector. PLoS ONE 14, e0213840 (2019).
Google Scholar
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kitzmiller, R. R. et al. Diffusing an innovation: clinician perceptions of continuous predictive analytics monitoring in intensive care. Appl. Clin. Inform. 10, 295–306 (2019).
Google Scholar
So, S., Ismail, M. R. & Jaafar, S. Exploring acceptance of artificial intelligence amongst healthcare personnel: a case in a private medical centre. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Manag. 3, 56–65 (2021).
Tscholl, D. W., Weiss, M., Handschin, L., Spahn, D. R. & Nöthiger, C. B. User perceptions of avatar-based patient monitoring: a mixed qualitative and quantitative study. BMC Anesthesiol. 18, 188 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chow, A., Lye, D. C. B. & Arah, O. A. Psychosocial determinants of physicians’ acceptance of recommendations by antibiotic computerised decision support systems: a mixed methods study. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 45, 295–304 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sandhu, S. et al. Integrating a machine learning system into clinical workflows: qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e22421 (2020).
Google Scholar
Elahi, C. et al. An attitude survey and assessment of the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of a traumatic brain injury decision support tool in Uganda. World Neurosurg. 139, 495–504 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alumran, A. et al. Utilization of an electronic triage system by emergency department nurses. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 13, 339–344 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. & Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5, 210 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pumplun, L., Fecho, M., Wahl, N., Peters, F. & Buxmann, P. Adoption of machine learning systems for medical diagnostics in clinics: qualitative interview study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, e29301 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schulte, A. et al. Automatic speech recognition in the operating room–An essential contemporary tool or a redundant gadget? A survey evaluation among physicians in form of a qualitative study. Ann. Med. Surg. 59, 81–85 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stifter, J. et al. Acceptability of clinical decision support interface prototypes for a nursing electronic health record to facilitate supportive care outcomes. Int. J. Nurs. Knowl. 29, 242–252 (2018).
Google Scholar
Norton, W. E. et al. Acceptability of the decision support for safer surgery tool. Am. J. Surg. 209, 977–984 (2015).
Google Scholar
Walter, S. et al. “What about automated pain recognition for routine clinical use?” A survey of physicians and nursing staff on expectations, requirements, and acceptance. Front. Med. 7, 566278 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jones, E. K., Banks, A., Melton, G. B., Porta, C. M. & Tignanelli, C. J. Barriers to and facilitators for acceptance of comprehensive clinical decision support system–driven care maps for patients with thoracic trauma: interview study among health care providers and nurses. JMIR Hum. Factors 9, e29019 (2022).
Google Scholar
Weng, S. F., Reps, J., Kai, J., Garibaldi, J. M. & Qureshi, N. Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? Stephen. PLoS ONE 12, 1–14 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, T., Fan, W. & Wu, C. A hybrid machine learning approach to cerebral stroke prediction based on imbalanced medical dataset. Artif. Intell. Med. 101, 101723 (2019).
Google Scholar
Challen, R. et al. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual. Saf. 28, 231–237 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bedaf, S., Marti, P., Amirabdollahian, F. & de Witte, L. A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: the voice of different stakeholders. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 13, 592–599 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hebesberger, D., Koertner, T., Gisinger, C. & Pripfl, J. A long-term autonomous robot at a care hospital: a mixed methods study on social acceptance and experiences of staff and older adults. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 417–429 (2017).
Google Scholar
Varshney, K. R. Engineering safety in machine learning. In 2016 Information Theory Applications Work (ITA) 2016 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2017).
Ko, Y. et al. Practitioners’ views on computerized drug-drug interaction alerts in the VA system. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 14, 56–64 (2007).
Google Scholar
Ruskin, K. J. & Hueske-Kraus, D. Alarm fatigue: Impacts on patient safety. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 28, 685–690 (2015).
Google Scholar
Poncette, A.-S. et al. Improvements in patient monitoring in the intensive care unit: survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e19091 (2020).
Google Scholar
Recht, M. & Bryan, R. N. Artificial intelligence: threat or boon to radiologists? J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 14, 1476–1480 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mayo, R. C. & Leung, J. Artificial intelligence and deep learning—radiology’s next frontier? Clin. Imaging 49, 87–88 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sarwar, S. et al. Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology. npj Digit. Med. 2, 1–7 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rogove, H. J., McArthur, D., Demaerschalk, B. M. & Vespa, P. M. Barriers to telemedicine: survey of current users in acute care units. Telemed. e-Health 18, 48–53 (2012).
Google Scholar
Safi, S., Thiessen, T. & Schmailzl, K. J. G. Acceptance and resistance of new digital technologies in medicine: qualitative study. J. Med. Internet Res. 7, e11072 (2018).
Bitterman, D. S., Aerts, H. J. W. L. & Mak, R. H. Approaching autonomy in medical artificial intelligence. Lancet Digit. Health 2, e447–e449 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wartman, S. A. & Combs, C. D. Medical education must move from the information age to the age of artificial intelligence. Acad. Med. 93, 1107–1109 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kolachalama, V. B. & Garg, P. S. Machine learning and medical education. npj Digit. Med. 1, 2–4 (2018).
Google Scholar
Paranjape, K., Schinkel, M., Panday, R. N., Car, J. & Nanayakkara, P. Introducing artificial intelligence training in medical education. JMIR Med. Educ. 5, e16048 (2019).
Google Scholar
Grunhut, J., Marques, O. & Wyatt, A. T. M. Needs, challenges, and applications of artificial intelligence in medical education curriculum. JMIR Med. Educ. 8, 1–5 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hoff, K. A. & Bashir, M. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Hum. Factors 57, 407–434 (2014).
Google Scholar
Oksanen, A., Savela, N., Latikka, R. & Koivula, A. Trust toward robots and artificial intelligence: an experimental approach to human–technology interactions online. Front. Psychol. 11, 568256 (2020).
Google Scholar
Choudhury, A. & Asan, O. Impact of cognitive workload and situation awareness on clinicians’ willingness to use an artificial intelligence system in clinical practice. IISE Trans. Healthc. Syst. Eng. 1–12 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2022.2127035.
Kolltveit, B. C. H. et al. Telemedicine in diabetes foot care delivery: Health care professionals’ experience. BMC Health Serv. Res. 16, 1–8 (2016).
Google Scholar
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D. & Preece, J. User-centered design. In Encyclopedia of Human–Computer Interaction Vol. 37 (ed. Bainbridge, W.) 445–456 (SAGE Publications, 2004).
Russell, C. L. An overview of the integrative research review. Prog. Transplant. 15, 8–13 (2005).
Google Scholar
Whittemore, R. & Knafl, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 52, 546–553 (2005).
Google Scholar
Hong, Q. N. et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ. Inf. 34, 285–291 (2018).
Hand, M. et al. A clinical decision support system to assist pediatric oncofertility: a short report. J. Adolesc. Young-Adult Oncol. 7, 509–513 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hsiao, J.-L., Wu, W.-C. & Chen, R.-F. Factors of accepting pain management decision support systems by nurse anesthetists. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 13, 1–13 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lin, H.-C. et al. From precision education to precision medicine: factors affecting medical staffs intention to learn to use AI applications in hospitals. Technol. Soc. 24, 123–137 (2021).
Esmaeilzadeh, P., Sambasivan, M., Kumar, N. & Nezakati, H. Adoption of clinical decision support systems in a developing country: antecedents and outcomes of physician’s threat to perceived professional autonomy. Int. J. Med. Inform. 84, 548–560 (2015).
Google Scholar
Strohm, L. et al. Factors influencing the adoption of computerized medical diagnosing system for tuberculosis. JMIR Hum. Factors 9, 1–12 (2021).
Zhai, H. et al. Radiation oncologists’ perceptions of adopting an artificial intelligence-assisted contouring technology: model development and questionnaire study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23, 1–16 (2021).
Google Scholar
link
