November 1, 2024

Wellness Nest

take care of your Health d, Live Your Best Life

Medical specialty certification exams studied according to the Ottawa Quality Criteria: a systematic review | BMC Medical Education

Medical specialty certification exams studied according to the Ottawa Quality Criteria: a systematic review | BMC Medical Education
  • de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):216–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Memon MA, Joughin GR, Memon B. Oral assessment and postgraduate medical examinations: establishing conditions for validity, reliability and fairness. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(2):277–89.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiessen N, Fischer MR, Huwendiek S. Assessment methods in medical specialist assessments in the DACH region – overview, critical examination and recommendations for further development. GMS J Med Educ. 2019;36(6):Doc78–Web.

  • Wijnen-Meijer M, Burdick W, Alofs L, Burgers C, Ten Cate O. Stages and transitions in medical education around the world: Clarifying structures and terminology. Med Teach. 2013;35(4):301–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassel CK, Holmboe ES. Professionalism and accountability: the role of specialty board certification. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008;119:295–303 (discussion 303-304).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp LK, Bashook PG, Lipsky MS, Horowitz SD, Miller SH. Specialty board certification and clinical outcomes: The missing link. Acad Med. 2002;77(6):534–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Physician board certification and the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(3):238–44.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prystowsky JB, Bordage G, Feinglass JM. Patient outcomes for segmental colon resection according to surgeon’s training, certification, and experience. Surgery. 2002;132(4):663–70 (discussion 670-662).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid RO, Friedberg MW, Adams JL, McGlynn EA, Mehrotra A. Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(16):1442–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Phillips RL Jr. Specialty board certification in the United States: issues and evidence. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S20–35.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in A. In: To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. edn. Edited by Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2000 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2000.

  • Weiss KB. Future of board certification in a new era of public accountability. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(Suppl 1):S32–39.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • James JT. A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9(3):122–8.

  • Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):206–14.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Hays R, Palacios Mackay MF, Roberts T, Swanson D. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach. 2018;40(11):1102–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spike N. Is medical postgraduate certification improving health outcomes? Med Educ. 2002;36:7–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson L, Aitken P, Hayes T. Are medical postgraduate certification processes valid? A systematic review of the published evidence. Med Educ. 2002;36(1):73–91.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Herb U, Geith U. Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen: Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA. Information – Wissenschaft & Praxis. 2020;71(2–3):77–85.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook DA, Reed DA. Appraising the quality of medical education research methods: the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1067–76.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkenstadt H, Ziv A, Gafni N, Sidi A. The validation process of incorporating simulation-based accreditation into the anesthesiology Israeli national board exams. Israel Med Assoc J. 2006;8(10):728–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Warner DO, Patterson AJ, Harman AE, Rathmell JP, Keegan MT, Dainer RJ, McLoughlin TM, Fahy BG, MacArio A. The American Board of Anesthesiology’s Standardized Oral Examination for Initial Board Certification. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(5):1394–400.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner DO, Lien CA, Wang T, Zhou Y, Isaak RS, Peterson-Layne C, Harman AE, Macario A, Gaiser RR, Suresh S, et al. First-Year Results of the American Board of Anesthesiology’s Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Initial Certification. Anesth Analg. 2020;23:1412–8.

  • Warner DO, Isaak RS, Peterson-Layne C, Lien CA, Sun H, Menzies AO, Cole DJ, Dainer RJ, Fahy BG, Macario A, et al. Development of an objective structured clinical examination as a component of assessment for initial board certification in anesthesiology. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(1):258–64.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gali A, Roiter H, de Mollein D, Swieszkowskimtsac S, Atamañuk N, Guerreromtsac AA, Grancellimtsac H, Barero C. Evaluation of the quality of multiple-choice questions used in cardiology certification and recertification exams. Revista Argentina de Cardiologia. 2011;79(5):419–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan LT, McAleer JJA. The Introduction of Single Best Answer Questions as a Test of Knowledge in the Final Examination for the Fellowship of the Royal College of Radiologists in Clinical Oncology. Clin Oncol. 2008;20(8):571–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary F. Simulation as a high stakes assessment tool in emergency medicine. EMA – Emerg Med Australas. 2015;27(2):173–5.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi L, Gallagher EJ, Korte R, Ham HP. Interexaminer agreement on the American Board of Emergency Medicine oral certification examination. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41(6):859–64.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovut DP, Saiar A, Gray BH. Endovascular medicine certification 2005–2014: report from the american board of vascular medicine. Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom). 2015;20(3):245–50.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Khafagy G, Ahmed M, Saad N. Stepping up of MCQs’ quality through a multi-stage reviewing process. Educ Prim Care. 2016;27(4):299–303.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten MA, Polliack MR, Tabenkin H, Kahan E. Variations among examiners in family medicine residency board oral examinations. Med Educ. 2000;34(1):13–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill TR, Royal KD, Puffer JC. Performance on the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) certification examination: are superior test-taking skills alone sufficient to pass? J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(2):175–80.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill TR, Peabody MR, Stelter KL, Puffer JC, Brady JE. Validating the Test Plan Specifications for the American Board of Family Medicine’s Certification Examination. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019;32(6):876–82.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco M, Spike N, Powell R, Brownlea A. Assessing communication skills of GP registrars: a comparison of patient and GP examiner ratings. Med Educ. 2002;36(4):366–76.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro N, Denney ML, Rughani A, Foulkes J, Wilson A, Tate P. Ensuring reliability in UK written tests of general practice: the MRCGP examination 1998–2003. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):37–45.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RG, Ballard KD. What is being assessed in the MRCGP oral examination? A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(515):430–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandars J, Coughlin S, Foulkes J. The assessment of skills in evidence-based medicine: The MRCGP examination approach. Educ Prim Care. 2004;15:550–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon H. The multiple-choice paper of the MRCGP examination: a study of candidates’ views of its content and effect on learning. Educ Prim Care. 2005;16(6):655–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siriwardena AN, Edwards AGK, Campion P, Freeman A, Elwyn G. Involve the patient and pass the MRCGP: investigating shared decision making in a consulting skills examination using a validated instrument. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(532):857–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon H. Candidates’ views of the MRCGP examination and its effects upon approaches to learning: a questionnaire study in the Northern Deanery. Educ Prim Care. 2003;14:146–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wass V, Wakeford R, Neighbour R, Van Der Vleuten C. Achieving acceptable reliability in oral examinations: an analysis of the Royal College of General Practitioners membership examination’s oral component. Med Educ. 2003;37(2):126–31.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon H, Blow C, Milne P, Siriwardena N, Milne H, Elfes C. Quality assurance of the Applied Knowledge Test (AKT) of the MRCGP examination – an immediate post-test questionnaire evaluation of the candidates’ views. Educ Prim Care. 2015;26(4):223–32.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge J. Feedback from candidates sitting the written module of the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners examination in Spring 2006: a satisfactory conclusion. Educ Prim Care. 2008;19(2):165–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon H, Blow C, Irish B, Milne P, Siriwardena AN. Evaluation of a postgraduate examination for primary care: perceptions and performance of general practitioner trainers in the multiple choice paper of the Membership Examination of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Educ Prim Care. 2007;18(2):165–72.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque J, Skinner H, Dupré J, Bacchus M, Ainslie M, Ma IWY, Cole G. Performance of the Ebel standard-setting method in spring 2019 royal college of physicians and surgeons of canada internal medicine certification examination consisted of multiple-choice questions. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020;17:12–Web.

  • Chierakul N, Danchaivijitr S, Kontee P, Naruman C. Reliability and validity of long case and short case in internal medicine board certification examination. J Med Assoc Thai. 2010;93(4):424–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus IC, Mooney-Somers J, Dacre JE, Vale JA. Reliability of the MRCP(UK) Part I Examination, 1984–2001. Med Educ. 2003;37(7):609–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus IC, Elder AT, Dacre J. Investigating possible ethnicity and sex bias in clinical examiners: an analysis of data from the MRCP(UK) PACES and nPACES examinations. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:103.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McManus IC, Thompson M, Mollon J. Assessment of examiner leniency and stringency (‘hawk-dove effect’) in the MRCP(UK) clinical examination (PACES) using multi-facet Rasch modelling. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:42. https://rdcu.be/dkHg6.

  • Atsawarungruangkit A: Relationship of residency program characteristics with pass rate of the American Board of Internal Medicine certifying exam. Med Educ Online. 2015;20(1):28631.

  • Marques TR, Lains I, Martins MJ, Goiana-Da-Silva F, Sampaio F, Pessanha I, Fernandes DH, Brandao M, Pinto Teixeira P, de Oliveira SM, et al. Evaluation of the medical board exam in Portugal. Acta Med Port. 2018;31(11):670–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch VC, Norman GR. Turning words into numbers: establishing an empirical cut score for a letter graded examination. Med Teach. 2009;31(5):442–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch VC, Norman GR, Schmidt HG, van der Vleuten CP. Are specialist certification examinations a reliable measure of physician competence? Adv Health Sci Educ. 2008;13(4):521–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson J. A critique of the specialty certificate examinations of the Federation of Royal Colleges of Physicians of the UK. Clin Med J R Coll Phys Lond. 2010;10(2):141–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucklow J. Development and implementation of the specialty certificate examinations. Clinical Medicine. J R Coll Phys Lond. 2011;11(3):235–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raddatz MM, Royal KD, Pennington J. Evaluating the Systematic Validity of a Medical Subspecialty Examination. Online Submission Paper presented at the Midwestern Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunz ME, Bashook PG. Relationship between candidate communication ability and oral certification examination scores. Med Educ. 2008;42(12):1227–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston JE, Myford CM. Judges’ perception of candidates’ organization and communication, in relation to oral certification examination ratings. Acad Med. 2009;84(11):1603–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathysen DG, Aclimandos W, Roelant E, Wouters K, Creuzot-Garcher C, Ringens PJ, Hawlina M, Tassignon MJ. Evaluation of adding item-response theory analysis for evaluation of the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(7):e573–577.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathysen DGP, Aclimandos W, Roelant E, Wouters K, Creuzot-Garcher C, Ringens PJ, Hawlina M, Tassignon MJ. History and future of the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(6):589–93.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow R, Zhang L, Soong IS, Mang OWK, Lui LCY, Wong KH, Siu SWK, Lo SH, Yuen KK, Yau YSH, et al. Inter-rater Reliability of Examiners in the Hong Kong College of Radiologists’ Palliative Medicine Oral Examination. Hong Kong J Radiol. 2017;20(3):232–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althouse LA, Du Y, Ham HP. Confirming the validity of the general pediatrics certification examinations: a practice analysis. J Pediatr. 2009;155(2):155–156.e151.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Emadzadeh A, Ravanshad Y, Makarem A, Azarfar A, Ravanshad S, Aval SB, Mehrad-Majd H, Alizadeh A. Challenges of OSCE national board exam in Iran from participants’ perspective. Electronic Phys [Electronic Resource]. 2017;9(4):4195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raddatz MM, Robinson LR. Demonstrating construct validity of the american board of physical medicine and rehabilitation part i examination: an analysis of dimensionality. PM and R. 2017;9(10):985–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbo P, Templeman K. The RCPSC oral examination: patient perceptions and impact on participating psychiatric patients. Can J Psychiat. 2004;49(7):480–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong E, Spooner M, Van Delden O, Uberoi R, Sheehan M, O’Neill DC, Lee M. The European board of interventional radiology examination: a cross-sectional web-based survey. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(1):21–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung A, Booth TC, Larkin TJ, McCoubrie P, McKnight L. The FRCR 2B oral examination: is it reliable? Clin Radiol. 2013;68(5):466–71.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung A, Booth TC, Jacob K, McCoubrie P, McKnight L. The FRCR 2B examination: a survey of candidate perceptions and experiences. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(5):412–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JC, Wallner PE, Becker GJ, Bosma JL, Gerdeman AM. Reliability of oral examinations: Radiation oncology certifying examination. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013;3(1):74–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerridge WD, Gunderman RB. The validity and timing of the ABR core exam. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(9):1176–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JC, Gerdeman AM, Becker GJ, Bosma JL. American Board of Radiology diagnostic radiology initial qualifying (written) examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(1):10–2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Ramos V, Guilaisne Bernard-Medina A, Flores-Alvarado DE, Portela-Hernández M, Maldonado-Velázquez MDR, Jara-Quezada LJ, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Rubio-Judith López-Zepeda NE, Álvarez-Hernandez E, Saavedra MÁ, et al. The method used to set the pass mark in an objective structured clinical examination defines the performance of candidates for certification as rheumatologists. Reumatologia Clinica. 2018;14(3):137–41.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JD, Prideaux D, Wolfe CL, Wilkinson TJ, Sen Gupta T, DeWitt DE, Worley P, Hays RB, Cowie M. Developing the accredited postgraduate assessment program for Fellowship of the Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine. Rural Remote Health. 2007;7(4):805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley SW, Wannan C, Hardware N. Justification and implications of the introduction of an expanded Close Marking System for the Fellowship Examination. ANZ J Surg. 2013;83(6):444–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montbrun S, Roberts PL, Satterthwaite L, Macrae H. Implementing and evaluating a national certification technical skills examination. Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):1–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry M, Park YS, Hennessy SA, et al. The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) skills test: factors associated with first-attempt scores and pass rate. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:3633–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07690-6.

  • Motoyama S, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, Yano M, Yasuda T, Ohira M, Kajiyama Y, Toh Y, Watanabe M, Kakeji Y, et al. Impact of certification status of the institute and surgeon on short-term outcomes after surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer: evaluation using data on 16,752 patients from the National Clinical Database in Japan. Esophagus. 2020;17(1):41–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Montbrun d, Lynn S. High Stakes Technical Skill Assessments in Surgery: Development, Implementation and Predicting Performance. 2017. p. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisostomo AC. The Effect of Standardization on the Reliability of the Philippine Board of Surgery Oral Examinations. J Surg Educ. 2011;68(2):138–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes RS, Biester TW, Bell RH Jr, Lewis FR Jr. Assessing Surgical Knowledge: a Primer on the Examination Policies of the American Board of Surgery. J Surg Educ. 2007;64(3):138–42.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundy P. Examining the orthopaedic examiners: Reliability of the Part 2 Orthopaedic Clinical Fellowship Examination in Australia. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82(9):607–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann E, Tetsworth K. Fellowship exit examination in orthopaedic surgery in the commonwealth countries of Australia, UK, South Africa and Canada. Are they comparable and equivalent? A perspective on the requirements for medical migration. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1537429–7.

  • Gillis ME, Scott SA, Richardson CG, Oxner WM, Gauthier L, Wilson DA, Glennie RA. Developing and assessing the feasibility of implementing a Surgical Objective Structured Clinical Skills Examination (S-OSCE). J Surg Educ. 2020;77(4):939–46.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann Y, Fodor L, Meilick B, Eshach H, Ramon Y, Meilick A. The oral board examination for plastic surgery: Seeking a better way. Med Teach. 2006;28(4):360–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer T, Chahal J, Murnaghan L, Theodoropoulos J, Cheung J, McParland A, Ogilvie-Harris D. Development of a certification examination for orthopedic sports medicine fellows. Can J Surgery Journal canadien de chirurgie. 2020;63(2):E110–7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne SR, Pickard RS, O’Flynn KJ, Winton EP. Does the Intercollegiate Specialty Examination in urology (FRCS Urol) assess the breadth of the urology syllabus? Br J Med Surg Urol. 2011;4(4):139–47.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann E, Tetsworth K. Fellowship exit examination in orthopaedic surgery in the commonwealth countries of Australia, UK, South Africa and Canada. Are they comparable and equivalent? A perspective on the requirements for medical migration. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1537429.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Practitioners RCoG. The RCGP Curriculum. Being a General Practitioner. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockyer J, Carraccio C, Chan M-K, Hart D, Smee S, Touchie C, Holmboe ES, Frank JR. Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2017;39(6):609–16.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montbrun S, Louridas M, Grantcharov T. Passing a technical skills examination in the first year of surgical residency can predict future performance. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(3):324–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63–67.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005;39(3):309–17.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Witheridge A, Ferns G, Scott-Smith W. Revisiting Miller’s pyramid in medical education: the gap between traditional assessment and diagnostic reasoning. Int J Med Educ. 2019;10:191–2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmboe ES, Hawkins RE. Methods for evaluating the clinical competence of residents in internal medicine: a review. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129(1):42–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges B. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):564–8.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan JR, Holmboe E. Realizing the Promise and Importance of Performance-Based Assessment. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(sup1):S68–74.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra S, Iobst WF, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. The importance of Competency-Based Programmatic Assessment in Graduate Medical Education. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(2s):113–9.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Dijkstra J, Tigelaar D, Baartman LKJ, van Tartwijk J. A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):205–14.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen EW, van Tartwijk J, Govaerts M, Teunissen P, van der Vleuten CP. The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: a Maastricht case report. Med Teach. 2012;34(3):226–31.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Driessen EW, Govaerts MJB, Heeneman S. Twelve tips for programmatic assessment. Med Teach. 2015;37(7):641–6.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • MRCGP Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) https://www.rcgp.org.uk/training-exams/mrcgp-exam/mrcgp-clinical-skills-assessment-csa.aspx.

  • WPBA assessments. https://www.rcgp.org.uk/training-exams/training/workplace-based-assessment-wpba/assessments.aspx.

  • MRCGP: Recorded Consultation Assessment (RCA). https://www.rcgp.org.uk/mrcgp-exams/recorded-consultation-assessment.

  • Silber JH, Kennedy SK, Even-Shoshan O, Chen W, Mosher RE, Showan AM, Longnecker DE. Anesthesiologist board certification and patient outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(5):1044–52.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace A, McFarland BH, Selvam N, Sahota G. Quality of care provided by board-certified versus non-board-certified psychiatrists and neurologists. Acad Med. 2017;92(1):108–15.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Norcini J, Lipner R, Kimball H. The certification status of generalist physicians and the mortality of their patients after acute myocardial infarction. Acad Med. 2001;76(10 Suppl):S21–23.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.